<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Enlightened Confusion &#187; FLOSS Weekly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://enlightened-confusion.net/tag/floss-weekly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://enlightened-confusion.net</link>
	<description>Less signal, more noise...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 22:39:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>

		<item>
		<title>More on Microblogging</title>
		<link>http://enlightened-confusion.net/2008/08/25/more-on-microblogging/</link>
		<comments>http://enlightened-confusion.net/2008/08/25/more-on-microblogging/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 01:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FLOSS Weekly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laconica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microblogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XMPP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enlightened-confusion.net/?p=74</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In yesterday&#8217;s post, I mentioned my belief that a big part of the problem that microblogging sites are having with scaling is the result of their design being primarily that of a content management website and not that of a messaging system which, I believe, is the more proper model.  I thought, after listening to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In yesterday&#8217;s <a title="What microblogging sites are missing" href="http://enlightened-confusion.net/2008/08/24/what-twitter-pownce-jaiku-et-al-are-missing/">post</a>, I mentioned my belief that a big part of the problem that microblogging sites are having with scaling is the result of their design being primarily that of a content management website and not that of a messaging system which, I believe, is the more proper model.  I thought, after listening to last weeks <a title="FLOSS Weely:  Laconica" href="http://twit.tv/floss37">FLOSS Weekly</a>, that <a title="Laconica" href="http://laconi.ca/trac/">Laconica</a> was taking a step toward this approach.  I&#8217;ve had some time to browse their website, and, they too are still primarily designed as a website.  I can understand their rational:  They want to scale through federation, so they want people to run individual sites for small communities.  To achieve this, they&#8217;ve come up with a design that will run on the lowliest of shared web hosting sites.  Finding a hosting service that allows you to run your own daemons and setting them up is much more complex than installing a PHP website.  It&#8217;s too bad.  A lot of what they are building in PHP is already in existing or drafted <a title="XMPP Specs" href="http://www.xmpp.org/">XMPP Specs</a>.</p>
<p>As long as the sites size remains under, say, a few thousand simulataneous users per server, I think this approach will probably work okay if coded efficiently.  However, I still believe that to scale the true national service size companies like Twitter aspire to be, you need a tiered architecture with the subscriptions and routing handled in the messaging server. That server then feeds real-time track searching engines and the database which feeds the website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://enlightened-confusion.net/2008/08/25/more-on-microblogging/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

